

- Xbench freezes on thread test mac os x#
- Xbench freezes on thread test drivers#
- Xbench freezes on thread test pro#
And it shouldn’t hold a candle to the mighty 2.66 GHz quad-core “Nehalem” Core i5 in my iMac.
Xbench freezes on thread test pro#
The base-model 13″ MacBook Pro uses a 2.3 GHz dual-core CPU, which hardly sounds better than the 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo chip used in my old MacBook Pro. Now let’s dig a little deeper into these performance numbers! CPU Performance Details Moore’s law ought to allow new machines to outperform old ones, but one is still surprised to see it so flamboyantly displayed. The fact that it achieves all this with a base price $600 less than my old MacBook Pro and runs for almost 7 hours on a charge is simply amazing. It even matches the high-end desktop in most tests, only falling behind when it comes to Disk, Thread and OpenGL graphics performance. It clobbers the Santa Rosa MacBook pro in CPU, Thread, Memory, Quartz, UI, and disk tests, and ties in OpenGL performance. Even though it is the absolute base model in the line, the new MacBook Pro matches or bests my old machine in every respect. Performance Overview The new 13" MacBook Pro performance admirablyĪs others have reported, overall performance is solid. So I used the original Xbench tests I performed when the machines were new. Since I am a storage guy, I have long-since upgraded the hard disk drives in both machines, and felt it was unfair to compare the OEM drive in the new MacBook Pro to these upgraded drives.
Xbench freezes on thread test mac os x#
The disk tests, however, were run under either 10.6.6 (in the case of the 13″ MacBook Pro and iMac) or the version of Mac OS X that came with the machine originally (in the case of the 15″ Santa Rosa MacBook Pro and the Mac Mini). The CPU, graphics, and memory tests were performed running the latest version of Mac OS X “Snow Leopard”, version 10.6.6. Although everyone’s performance baseline will be different, I was interested in how the new MacBook Pro compares to my other machines, and my 15″ machine in particular. This probably seems like an odd and motley assortment, but they all have one thing in common: I own them. Quad-core 3.1 GHz “Sandy Bridge” Core i5-2400 Still has the original 3.5″ Seagate 1 TB hard disk drive.ĭisk tests reflect the original (terrible) 120 GB Hitachi hard disk drive. The base-model configuration, with 4 GB of RAM and the 320 GB Hitachi hard disk drive. This should help get a feel for how much slower or faster it is than the other machines. Geekbench is a great cross-platform CPU test, but it doesn’t measure as wide a variety of system parameters as Xbench.Įach Xbench test was normalized against the new MacBook Pro, which always shows as “100%” in these charts. Plus, I had historical data from all of my machines. Xbench is outdated but solid and universally-accepted as the standard Mac benchmark. The following benchmarks were performed using Xbench and Geekbench, running on a freshly-booted machine. It meets my needs as a travel workstation, but how does it perform? I decided to benchmark it against my other Macs to see how it stands up.
Xbench freezes on thread test drivers#
In 9.1 the sonnet drivers for the cpu caused crashes but after replacing them with cpu director it worked fine.The new MacBook Pro impresses with its performanceĪs I mentioned in my previous article, I decided to buy the 13″ Core i5 (base model) MacBook Pro. I have 576mb with only one 32mb strip not interleaved but its worth to try it when you keep having troubles. Unlike the advise of Sonnet I didn't de-interleave the memory. After the last change of slots I removed the battery and pressed the cuda switch for several seconds. What made the big difference was when I placed the videoboard in the upper slot and the usb/fw card in the second leaving the third slot empty. I shuffled the pci cards untill I ended up with the positions I wrote. XBench test results: CPU Test 84.84 Thread Test 39.65 Memory Test 45.87 Quartz Graphics Test 63.96 OpenGL Graphics Test 96.89 User Interface Test 59.92 Disk Test 62.96

All drives initialised with Intech HD SpeedTools. One 9gb UW drive with OS 9.1 on the internal fast SCSI bus. Initio Miles U2W SCSI in slot D2 with one 9gb drive running OS X and one partitioned 74gb drive and a second OS 10.2.6 system. (No QE enabled) -The Ratoc USB/FireWire board in slot B1 on OSX drivers with iBot FW webcam. ATI Radeon 7000 Mac edition in slot A1 on OSX drivers. The Sonnet G4/800 in with Powerlogix CPU Director for cache enabling. Have had all the problems written before but finally everything works flawless. Been reading a lot of those upgrades and have them all in my 9650.
